• Skip to primary navigation
  • Skip to main content
  • Skip to primary sidebar

Carnegie Museum of Natural History

One of the Four Carnegie Museums of Pittsburgh

  • Visit
    • Buy Tickets
    • Visitor Information
    • Exhibitions
    • Events
    • Dining at the Museum
    • Celebrate at the Museum
    • Powdermill Nature Reserve
    • Event Venue Rental
    • Gift Cards
  • Learn
    • Field Trips
    • Educator Information
    • Programs at the Museum
    • Bring the Museum to You
    • Guided Programs FAQ
    • Programs Online
    • Climate and Rural Systems Partnership
  • Research
    • Scientific Sections
    • Science Stories
    • Science Videos
    • Senior Science & Research Staff
    • Museum Library
    • Science Seminars
    • Scientific Publications
    • Specimen and Artifact Identification
  • About
    • Mission & Commitments
    • Directors Team
    • Museum History
  • Tickets
  • Give
  • Shop

Mapping Wildlife Habitats Beyond the Borders of Protected Areas

by Chase D. Mendenhall

The best way to prevent extinctions is to protect wildlife habitats. In a world where only 13% of the land surface is dedicated to nature reserves, croplands and pastures are playing an increasingly important role in the conversation of biodiversity by providing habitat to some wildlife. Historically, agricultural activities have been pitted against nature reserves—playing the role of the “inhospitable matrix” surrounding nature reserves, which act as “islands” that safeguard biodiversity into the future. In fact, the metaphor of “islands” and “matrix” comes from decades of research studying plants and animals on oceanic islands surrounded by water.

On the mainland, we continue the tradition of largely ignoring the matrix of human-made habitats and the wildlife that use them. A major reason for overlooking human-made habitats is that we develop and use mapping techniques that only value large tracts of wildlife habitat, that are incapable of mapping fine-scale habitats, and that incorrectly classify land use types by confusing forests with croplands and pastures.

map and diagram of trees in part of Costa Rica

A new study published by the Carnegie Museum of Natural History has attempted to test the classification precision and accuracy of automated tree mapping techniques for identifying wildlife habitat in Costa Rica. In the end, we were surprised to find that two prominent mapping techniques gave distorted estimates of tree cover in deforested areas and that these distortions are potentially leading to poor decision making beyond the borders of nature reserves. We recommend conservation scientists interested in quantifying wildlife habitats embedded in croplands and pastures to consider modest techniques of digitizing habitats by hand using Google Earth. We also identify lots of room for developing new technologies using satellites, citizen science, and drones to solve the problem of counting up wildlife habitats, big and small.

The full study is available as a PDF: Improving tree cover estimates for fine-scale landscape ecology.

Chase Mendenhall is Assistant Curator of Birds, Ecology, and Conservation at Carnegie Museum of Natural History. Museum employees are encouraged to blog about their unique experiences and knowledge gained from working at the museum.

sidebar

About

  • Mission & Commitments
  • Directors Team
  • Museum History

Get Involved

  • Volunteer
  • Membership
  • Carnegie Discoverers
  • Donate
  • Employment
  • Events

Bring a Group

  • Groups of 10 or More
  • Birthday Parties at the Museum
  • Field Trips

Powdermill

  • Powdermill Nature Reserve
  • Powdermill Field Trips
  • Powdermill Staff
  • Research at Powdermill

More Information

  • Image Permission Requests
  • Science Stories
  • Accessibility
  • Shopping Cart
  • Contact
  • Visitor Policies
Stay in the loop! Sign up for our newsletter(s).
One of the Four Carnegie Museums | © Carnegie Institute | Privacy Policy | Terms of Use | Accessibility
Rad works here logo