• Skip to primary navigation
  • Skip to main content
  • Skip to primary sidebar

Carnegie Museum of Natural History

One of the Four Carnegie Museums of Pittsburgh

  • Visit
    • Buy Tickets
    • Visitor Information
    • Exhibitions
    • Events
    • Dining at the Museum
    • Celebrate at the Museum
    • Powdermill Nature Reserve
    • Event Venue Rental
  • Learn
    • Field Trips
    • Educator Information
    • Programs at the Museum
    • Bring the Museum to You
    • Guided Programs FAQ
    • Programs Online
    • Climate and Rural Systems Partnership
  • Research
    • Scientific Sections
    • Science Stories
    • Science Videos
    • Senior Science & Research Staff
    • Museum Library
    • Science Seminars
    • Scientific Publications
    • Specimen and Artifact Identification
  • About
    • Mission & Commitments
    • Directors Team
    • Museum History
  • Tickets
  • Give
  • Shop

Cephalopods

June 25, 2019 by wpengine

Sperm Whales and Giant Squid: Just-So Story and Co-Evolution

sperm whale underwater

Sperm whales dive to great depths (to more than 2 km or 1.4 mi deep) to catch one of their favorite foods: giant squid. But how did the first sperm whale know it would find giant squids in the ocean depths? The following story is speculation that makes sense but has no facts to support it. Scientists often refer to such stories as just-so stories, named after the stories by author Rudyard Kipling. But while Kipling’s just-so stories are fanciful, my story is plausible.

Before whales evolved, it could be that giant squids lived near the ocean surface. After whales evolved and discovered that squids are tasty, the giant squids might have started living in deeper water, to escape the whale predators. Some whales might have started diving more deeply (and developed specialized physiology allowing them to hold their breath up to 90 minutes and to resist the great pressure at depth) so they could feast on the squid, so the squid might have responded by living deeper still. Cycles like this, between predators and prey, are examples of co-evolution. This cycle could have continued until the squid lived in some of the deepest parts of the ocean, and the sperm whales dove to those great depths to eat the tasty squids. That just-so story might explain why giant squid live at depth, and how sperm whales are able to dive that deep to find them.

Humans hunted sperm whales heavily from the 1700s to the middle 1900s and reduced their numbers possibly to a third what they were historically. Fewer whales would mean less predation pressure on giant squids. With reduced predation pressure, giant squids might venture into shallower water.

It is possible that such a change in squid behavior could lead to more sightings of giant squids over the last few decades (squids caught in fishing nets and caught on cameras). Or it is possible that improvements in technology explains the increased sightings. You might be thinking that humans have interacted with giant squids for centuries – consider the myths of giant squids attacking ships. I agree that humans have known about giant squids for centuries, but I doubt anyone had previously ever seen one alive. Humans are likely to have known about giant squids from examining the gut contents of sperm whales, or possibly from a squid carcass that floated to the ocean surface after it died.

drawing of a kraken devouring a sailing ship

We might never know the real answer to why giant squid live at depth, and why sperm whales are able to dive to such great depths (and how they know squids are there). This co-evolutionary just-so story is a plausible explanation.

Timothy A. Pearce, PhD, is the head of the mollusks section at Carnegie Museum of Natural History. Museum employees are encouraged to blog about their unique experiences and knowledge gained from working at the museum.

Filed Under: Blog Tagged With: Cephalopods, mollusks, Tim Pearce

February 19, 2019 by wpengine

Octopus mystery: how do they see color?

eye of a cuttlefish
Eye of a cuttlefish. Note the W shaped pupil. (Image from Wikimedia Commons)

The eyes of cephalopods like octopus, squid, and cuttlefish possess only one kind of photoreceptor, implying that they are colorblind, being able to see only in greyscale. But wait! They are famous masters of camouflage, being able to blend with their surroundings, and they signal each other in intricate color patterns. These feats suggest that they are not colorblind.

Two main hypotheses to explain this mystery are (1) they also see with their skin (Wardill et al. 2015) or (2) they make use of chromatic aberration (Stubbs & Stubbs 2016).

Cephalopods certainly do possess photosensitive molecules called opsins in their skin, so potential exists for cephalopods to detect light with their skin. However, the photosensitive molecules in the skin are like those in the eyes, so it’s not clear how that would help them see color any better than the eyes do.

Chromatic aberration is the differential bending of light of different wavelengths (colors). That’s how a prism splits white light, and why when your eyes get dilated by the eye doctor, besides things becoming blurry, you also see rainbows around things. Light of different wavelengths passing through a lens has different focal points. For most organisms and for human-made optical devices, chromatic aberration is a problem to be minimized.

The chromatic aberration hypothesis proposes that instead of avoiding chromatic aberration, cephalopods enhance it using their peculiar off-axis pupil shapes. This enhancement allows them to detect color by monitoring image blurring as focus changes. Computer models show that this method of image detection is possible.

Such use of chromatic aberration could explain why cephalopods have such bizarre pupil shapes. The pupil in some octopuses is an elongate slit, and in cuttlefish, it is the shape of a W.

These two hypotheses yield different predictions under certain circumstances, such as colors on a flat field (for which focus would not change). Now we await results of experiments testing between these two possibilities. Then we will have an answer for how cephalopods can see color, despite having the appearance of being color blind. We might need to re-evaluate other creatures that have been labeled colorblind.

Timothy A. Pearce is Curator of Collections, Section of Mollusks at Carnegie Museum of Natural History. Museum employees are encouraged to blog about their unique experiences and knowledge gained from working at the museum.

Literature cited

Kingston, A.C.N., Wardill, T.J., Hanlon, R.T. & Cronin, T.W. 2015. An unexpected diversity of photoreceptor classes in the longfin squid, Doryteuthis pealeii. PLoS ONE 10(9): e0135381. doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0135381

Stubbs, A.L. & Stubbs, C.W. 2016. Spectral discrimination in color blind animals via chromatic aberration and pupil shape. Proceedings of the National Academy of Science U.S.A.113: 8206–8211. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1524578113

Filed Under: Blog Tagged With: Cephalopods, mollusks, Section of Mollusks, Tim Pearce

sidebar

About

  • Mission & Commitments
  • Directors Team
  • Museum History

Get Involved

  • Volunteer
  • Membership
  • Carnegie Discoverers
  • Donate
  • Employment
  • Events

Bring a Group

  • Groups of 10 or More
  • Birthday Parties at the Museum
  • Field Trips

Powdermill

  • Powdermill Nature Reserve
  • Powdermill Field Trips
  • Powdermill Staff
  • Research at Powdermill

More Information

  • Image Permission Requests
  • Science Stories
  • Accessibility
  • Shopping Cart
  • Contact
  • Visitor Policies
One of the Four Carnegie Museums | © Carnegie Institute | Privacy Policy | Terms of Use | Accessibility
Rad works here logo